Key Values for Democratic-Governance Innovation: Two Traditions and a Synthesis
Hendriks, F. (2021). Key Values for Democratic-Governance Innovation: Two Traditions and a Synthesis. Public Administration , online first.
Are Populists Sore Losers? Explaining Populist Citizens’ Preferences for and Reactions to Referendums
Werner, H., & Jacobs, k. (2021). Are Populists Sore Losers? Explaining Populist Citizens' Preferences for and Reactions to Referendums.British Journal of Political Science , 1-9.
Setting the voting agenda for multi-option referendums: process variations and civic empowerment
Wagenaar , C.C.L. & Hendriks , F. (2021). Setting the voting agenda for multi-option referendums: process variations and civic empowerment. Democratization , 28, 372-393.
Unraveling the New Plebiscitary Democracy: Towards a Research Agenda
Hendriks, F. (2021). Unraveling the New Plebiscitary Democracy: Towards a Research Agenda. Government and Opposition , 56(4), 615-639.
Does democratic innovation reduce bias? The G1000 as a new form of local participation
Binnema , H. & Michels , A. (2021). Does democratic innovation reduce bias? The G1000 as a new form of local participation. International Journal of
Support for citizens’ assemblies
Den Ridder, J., Fiselier, T. & Van Ham, C. (2021). Draagvlak voor het burgerforum. Een verkenning van de Nederlandse publieke opinie. Den Haag: SCP.
National citizens’ assemblies
Hendriks, F., Michels, A. & Jacobs, K. (2021). Nationale Burgerfora. Verkenning van nationale burgerfora als democratisch gereedschap. Den Haag: MinBZK
Research plan: demand side of democratic innovation
Den Ridder, J., Jacobs, K., Rosema, M. & Van Ham, C. (2021). Democratische innovatie in Nederland: het perspectief van burgers. Startnotitie vervaardigd ten behoeve van
Research plan: supply side of democratic innovation
Michels, A., Hendriks, F. & Van Ham, C. (2021). Democratische innovaties: een verkenning van de aanbodkant en de relevante criteria. Startnotitie vervaardigd ten behoeve van
